石油化工高等学校学报

石油化工高等学校学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 79-84.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-396X.2020.06.013

• 油气储运 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于CFD方法的无限大平板热扩散数值模拟

王博陈一鸣杜胜男王卫强   

  1. 辽宁石油化工大学 石油天然气工程学院,辽宁 抚顺 113001
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-05 修回日期:2019-09-21 出版日期:2020-12-25 发布日期:2020-12-30
  • 通讯作者: 杜胜男(1974-),男,博士,讲师,从事数值模拟分析研究;E-mail:wwq001@163.com。
  • 作者简介:王博(1994-),男,硕士研究生,从事数值模拟分析研究;E-mail:bobaocomeon@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省自然科学基金指导计划项目(20180550745);辽宁省教育厅自然科学基金研究项目(L2020027)。

Numerical Simulation of Infinitely Large Plate Thermal Diffusion Based on CFD Method

Wang BoChen YimingDu ShengnanWang Weiqiang   

  1. College of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun Liaoning 113001, China
  • Received:2019-08-05 Revised:2019-09-21 Published:2020-12-25 Online:2020-12-30

摘要: 传统CFD方法在求解不可压缩流动Navier⁃Stokes方程时,压力方程具有椭圆形,无法推进求解,收敛性较差,因此传统CFD方法具有一定的局限性。对此研究格子玻尔兹曼方法与传统CFD方法的计算效率与准确性,以恒温边界的平板热扩散问题为例,分别运用有限元体积法、有限差分法及格子玻尔兹曼方法对平板间的温度场进行求解,通过对比求解结果及归一化迭代步数,明确格子玻尔兹曼方法计算的可行性、准确性与高效性。结果表明,相同物理模型条件下,格子玻尔兹曼方法和有限差分法的求解准确性要略优于有限元体积法;格子玻尔兹曼方法的求解速度最快,迭代步数最少,有限差分法、有限元体积法求解速度最慢。

关键词: 平板, 热扩散, 有限元体积法, 有限差分法, 格子玻尔兹曼, 数值模拟

Abstract: When the traditional CFD method is used to solve the Navier⁃Stokes equation of incompressible flow, the pressure equation has an elliptical shape and cannot be solved, and the convergence is poor. Therefore, the traditional CFD method has certain limitations. In order to study the computational efficiency and accuracy of the lattice Boltzmann method compared with the traditional CFD method, taking the thermal diffusion problem of plates with constant temperature boundary as an example, the temperature field between the plates is solved by the finite element volume method, the finite difference method and the lattice Boltzmann method. By comparing the solution results and the number of normalized iteration steps, the feasibility, accuracy and efficiency of the lattice Boltzmann method are clarified. The results show that under the same physical model, the lattice Boltzmann method and the finite difference method are slightly better than the finite element volume method. The lattice Boltzmann method has the fastest solution speed and the least iteration steps, followed by the finite difference method, and the finite element volume method has slowest solution speed.

Key words: Plate, thermal diffusion, Finite element volume method, Finite difference method, Lattice Boltzmann, Numerical simulation

引用本文

王博, 陈一鸣, 杜胜男, 王卫强. 基于CFD方法的无限大平板热扩散数值模拟[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2020, 33(6): 79-84.

Wang Bo, Chen Yiming, Du Shengnan, Wang Weiqiang. Numerical Simulation of Infinitely Large Plate Thermal Diffusion Based on CFD Method[J]. Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2020, 33(6): 79-84.

使用本文