河口坝砂岩体夹层发育特征及其对剩余油分布的影响——以史南油田L11断块沙二段为例

doi:10.12422/j.issn.1006-396X.2024.03.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以史南油田L11断块沙二段（S2）的断块油藏为例，运用测井、岩心、分析化验及生产动态资料，分析了河口坝砂岩体夹层的岩石及层次类型，描述了夹层的空间展布规律，阐明了夹层对剩余油分布的影响。结果表明，L11断块主力油层的泥质、物性和钙质夹层的占比分别为68%、21%、11%；钙质夹层集中发育在物性夹层分布区，距离物源较近的东北部、夹层尖灭处物性夹层发育程度较高，距离物源较远的西南部泥质夹层发育程度较高。近源方向5级构型界面较薄，远源方向较厚，厚度为0.60~29.00 m；4级构型界面夹层钻遇率在60%以上，厚度为0.35~4.10 m，倾角小于2.0°；3级构型界面夹层展布不超过3个井距，厚度小于1.50 m，平均倾角为2.7°。4级、5级构型界面对剩余油的分布起到了控制作用，3级构型界面对剩余油分布的影响较小，低注高采模式开发效果较好，高注低采模式开发效果较差，通过注采模式可以提高井组驱油效率及开发效果。以上成果及认识对河口坝砂岩油藏的高效开发具有重要的指导意义。

关键词: 河口坝, 夹层, L11断块, 剩余油

Abstract:

Estuary bar sandstone body is also one of the most important types of oil and gas reservoirs in China,and its internal interlayers control the distribution and movement of fluid inside the reservoir and affect the overall development effect of the reservoir. Taking the fault block reservoir of Sha-2（S2） member of L11 fault block in Shinan oilfield as an example, the rock and layer type of intercalation in estuary bar sandstone body are analyzed by means of logging, core, analysis and dynamic production data, the spatial distribution law of intercalation is described, and the influence of intercalation on remaining oil distribution is expounded.The results show that the main oil layer of L11 fault block consists of mud, physical and calc interlayers, which account for 68%,21% and 11% respectively.The calc interlayers are concentrated in the distribution area of physical interlayers,and the development degree of physical interlayers is relatively high in the northeast near the provenance and the peak of the interlayer, while the development degree of mud interlayers is relatively high in the southwest far from the provenance. In the near-source direction, the fifth-order configuration interface is relatively thin, and in the far-source direction, the thickness is relatively thick, ranging from 0.60 m to 29.00 m. In the fourth-order interface, the drilling rate of interlayer is above 60%, the thickness is between 0.35 m and 4.10 m, and the inclination is less than 2.0°. The level 3 interfacial interlayer is spread no more than 3 well spacing, the thickness is less than 1.50 m, and the dip angle is 2.7° on average. Level 4 and 5 interfaces control the distribution of remaining oil,level 3 interface has little influence on the distribution of remaining oil, low injection and high production mode development effect is relatively good,high injection and low production mode development effect is relatively poor,through the injection and production mode can improve the well group oil displacement efficiency and development effect.The above results and understanding have important guiding significance for the efficient development of estuary bar sandstone reservoir.

Key words: Estuary bar, Interlayer, L11 fault block, Remaining oil

中图分类号:

孙占强, 王春伟. 河口坝砂岩体夹层发育特征及其对剩余油分布的影响——以史南油田L11断块沙二段为例[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2024, 37(3): 34-41.

Zhanqiang SUN, Chunwei WANG. Development Characteristics of Sandstone Interlayer in Estuary Bar and Its Influence on Remaining Oil Distribution:Take the Example of Sha-2 Member of L11 Fault Block of Shinan Oilfield[J]. Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2024, 37(3): 34-41.

图/表 6

图2 L11断块夹层类型及特征

Fig.2 Types and characteristics of interlayers of L11 fault blocks

图3 L11-J1井S28砂组2小层构型界面分布

Fig.3 Configuration interface distribution of small layer 2 in sand group S28 of well L11-J1

（a） ①号5级构型界面（b） ②号5级构型界面图5　顺物源方向夹层平面展布

Fig.5 Interlayer distribution along source direction

图4 顺物源、垂物源方向河口坝构型解剖

Fig.4 Interlayer distribution along source direction

图6 河口坝砂岩夹层的发育模式

Fig.6 Development pattern of sandstone interlayer in estuary bar

图7 L11断块S28砂组典型注采剖面图

Fig.7 Typical injection-production profile of S28 sand group in L11 fault block

参考文献 21

1	吴胜和，岳大力，冯文杰，等.碎屑岩沉积构型研究若干进展［J］.古地理学报，2021，23（2）：245-262.
	WU S H，YUE D L，FENG W J，et al.Research progress of depositional architecture of clastic systems［J］.Journal of Palaeogeography，2021，23（2）：245-262.
2	王有慧，鲍君刚，王呈呈，等.高含水砂岩老油田剩余油综合分析及开发实践［J］.石油化工高等学校学报，2020，33（5）： 86-91.
	WANG Y H，BAO J G，WANG C C，et al.Comprehensive analysis of residual oil in high water cut sandstone oilfield and development practice［J］.Journal of Petrochemical Universities，2020，33（5）： 86-91.
3	刘太勋，李超，刘畅，等.三角洲前缘河口坝复合体剩余油分布物理模拟［J］.中国石油大学学报（自然科学版），2018， 42（6）：1-8.
	LIU T X，LI C，LIU C，et al. Experimental simulation of remaining oil distribution in combined debouch bar of delta front reservoir［J］.Journal of China University of Petroleum（Edition of Natural Science），2018，42（6）：1-8.
4	王昕，魏思源，吕奇奇，等.基于物理模拟的三角洲前缘横向砂坝发育过程及形成机理［J］.沉积学报，2023，41（3）：818-827.
	WANG X，WEI S Y，LÜ Q Q，et al.Development process and formation mechanism of transverse sand bar in delta front based on physical simulation［J］.Acta Sedimentologica Sinica，2023，41（3）：818-827.
5	张瑞，刘宗宾，廖新武，等.三角洲前缘砂体高含水期剩余油分布研究［J］.西南石油大学学报（自然科学版），2022，44（2）：1-18.
	ZHANG R，LIU Z B，LIAO X W，et al.A study on distribution of remaining oil in the high water-cut stage of delta front sand body［J］.Journal of Southwest Petroleum University（Science & Technology Edition），2022，44（2）：1-18.
6	王海峰，范廷恩，胡光义，等.基于地震识别复合砂体构型地质模型的剩余油开发井网井距规律：以渤海Q油田明化镇组R13油层为例［J］.东北石油大学学报，2021，45（5）：41-50.
	WANG H F，FAN T E，HU G Y，et al. Well network and well spacing pattern in remaining oil recovery based on geological pattern with seismic-identified complex sand architecture interfaces：Taking Minghuazhen formation R13 oil layer in Bohai Q oilfield for example［J］.Journal of Northeast Petroleum University，2021，45（5）：41-50.
7	陈德坡，方惠京，王军，等.坨11井区南沙二段8砂组河口坝砂体岩相组合识别及对储层的控制作用［J］.油气地质与采收率，2019，26（2）：51-59.
	CHEN D P，FANG H J，WANG J，et al.Lithofacies combination recognition and its impact on the reservoir in No.8 sand group of the second member of Shahejie Formation in the south of Tuo 11 area［J］.Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency，2019，26（2）：51-59.
8	邬德刚，吴胜和，刘磊，等.基于模式约束的油层单元智能自动对比方法——以渤海湾盆地史南油田史深100区块加积式地层对比为例［J］.石油勘探与开发，2024，51（1）：161-172.
	WU D G，WU S H，LIU L，et al.An intelligent automatic correlation method of reservoir elements based on model constraints：A case study of accretion formation correlation in Shishen 100 block， Shinan oilfield， Bohai bay basin［J］.Petroleum Exploration and Development，2024，51（1）：161-172.
9	党思思，孙志雄，裴帅，等.陆梁油田呼图壁组多层系砂岩油藏分层注水调控［J］.新疆石油地质，2023，44（4）：465-471.
	DANG S S，SUN Z X，PEI S，et al.A new method of water injection control for multilayered sandstone reservoirs：A case of Hutubi formation in Luliang oilfield［J］.Xinjiang Petroleum Geology，2023，44（4）：465-471.
10	于慧敏，宋彦辰，彭渝婷，等.柴达木盆地尕斯库勒油田E 3 1 油藏隔夹层特征、成因及分布［J］.特种油气藏，2021，28（4）： 79-87.
	YU H M，SONG Y C，PENG Y T，et al.Characteristics，genesis and distribution of interlayer in E 3 1 reservoir in Gasikule oilfield，Qaidam basin［J］.Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs，2021，28（4）：79-87.
11	王春伟，韩淑乔，杜焕福，等.东营凹陷低渗透岩性油藏储层非均质性特征及水驱剩余油分布规律［J］.海洋地质前沿，2024，40（1）：36-43.
	WANG C W，HAN S Q，DU H F，et al.Heterogeneity of low permeability lithologic reservoir and distribution of remaining water-driven oil in Dongying sag［J］.Marine Geology Frontiers，2024，40（1）：36-43.
12	袁丙龙，张辉，张连枝，等.涠西南凹陷浅水三角洲前缘砂体类型及分布模式［J］.中国海上油气，2020，32（2）：78-87.
	YUAN B L，ZHANG H，ZHANG L Z，et al.Types and distribution patterns of shallow water delta front sand bodies in Weixinan sag［J］.China Offshore Oil and Gas，2020，32（2）：78-87.
13	赵少泽，李勇，牟连刚，等.渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷沙河街组一段沉积相特征及成藏模式［J］.东北石油大学学报，2021，45（6）：1-14.
	ZHAO S Z，LI Y，MU L G，et al.Characteristics of sedimentary facies and oil accumulation model in first member of Shahejie formation Cangdong depression，Bohai bay basin［J］.Journal of Northeast Petroleum University，2021，45（6）：1-14.
14	胡文丽，邹信波，李黎，等. 珠江口盆地X油田夹层空间分布表征［J］. 科学技术与工程， 2022， 22（15）： 6041-6050.
	HU W L， ZOU X B， LI L， et al. Characterization of interlayer spatial distribution in X oilfield， Pearl River mouth basin［J］. Science Technology and Engineering， 2022， 22（15）： 6041-6050.
15	崔炳凯，李贤兵，李香玲，等.大井距条件下扇三角洲前缘储层构型表征——以乍得R油田R4区块KIV3组为例［J］.东北石油大学学报， 2022，46（5）：14-25.
	CUI B K， LI X B，LI X L， et al. Reservoir configuration characterization of fan delta front with large well spacing： A case study of KIV3 formation， block R4， R oilfield， chad［J］. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University， 2022，46（5）： 14-25.
16	苏朝博.基于构型界面控制的浅层优快钻井取心卡层方法［J］.石油钻采工艺，2023，45（6）：661-667.
	SU Z B.Formation identification method for coring during shallow optimal and fast drilling based onconfiguration interface control［J］.Oil Drilling & Production Technology，2023，45（6）：661-667.
17	李振鹏.渤海海域分流河道型浅水三角洲储层构型表征——以歧口油田明下段地层为例［J］.中国海上油气，2020，32（1）：103-110.
	LI Z P.Configuration characterization of distributary channel-type shallow water delta reservoirs in Bohai sea：Taking the lower Minghuazhen formation of QK oilfield as an example［J］.China Offshore Oil and Gas，2020，32（1）：103-110.
18	梁卫卫，党海龙，徐波，等.基于单砂体的湖泊三角洲相储层构型模型的建立——以鄂尔多斯盆地S区块为例［J］.西安石油大学学报（自然科学版），2020，35（2）：26-34.
	LIANG W W，DANG H L，XU B，et al.Establishment of reservoir architecture model of lacustrine delta based on single sandbody：Taking S area in ordos basin as an example［J］. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University（Natural Science），2020，35（2）：26-34.
19	马立民，宋宝顺，余成林，等.断陷小湖盆扇三角洲前缘储层单砂体构型特征——以南堡凹陷高76断块沙三_1亚段为例［J］.东北石油大学学报，2023，47（2）：1-17.
	MA L M，SONG B S，YU C L，et al.Single sandbody architecture characteristics of fan-delta front reservoir in a small lacustrine rift basin： A case study of the Es 3 1 oil formation，Gao-76 fault block，Nanpu Sag［J］.Journal of Northeast Petroleum University，2023，47（2）：1-17.
20	曲丽丽，段健，余成林，等.辫状河三角洲前缘水下分流河道精细刻画方法：以南堡凹陷M油田东一段为例［J］.地质科技通报，2023， 42（3）：134-141.
	QU L L，DUAN J，YU C L，et al.Fine description method of the underwater distributary channel in a braided river delta front：A case study of the first member of the Dongying formation in the M oilfield，Nanpu depression［J］.Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology，2023，42（3）：134-141.
21	王春伟，董佑桓，杨勇，等.辫状河油藏层内非均质性及其对剩余油分布的影响［J］.地质与资源，2022，31（6）：770-775.
	WANG C W，DONG Y H，YANG Y，et al.Heterogeneity in braided river reservoir and its influence on remaining oil distribution［J］.Geology and Resources，2022，31（6）：770-775. （编辑王戬丽）

[1]	郑彬, 廖新武, 刘宗宾, 刘玉娟, 张静, 闫志明. 基于储层构型的剩余油精细表征方法及挖潜策略——以渤海L油田东营组东二下亚段油层为例[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2021, 34(5): 36-42.
[2]	杨文武. B区块主力油层聚驱后变流线井网调整研究[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2021, 34(2): 54-59.
[3]	卓兴家，范佳乐，张继成. BQ57区Ⅲ1、3层剩余油潜力与分布规律研究[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2020, 33(6): 32-36.
[4]	赵洪鹏，姜贵璞. 裂缝性油藏微乳液配方优选及驱油效果[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2020, 33(5): 42-47.
[5]	王有慧，鲍君刚，王呈呈，高益桁. 高含水砂岩老油田剩余油综合分析及开发实践[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2020, 33(5): 86-91.
[6]	刘凡, 周文胜, 谢晓庆. 聚合物驱结合井网调整技术剩余油实验研究[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2020, 33(4): 28-33.
[7]	张继成，李清清，刘莉，陈新宇，张军. 考虑边水影响的蒸汽吞吐参数优化研究[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2019, 32(2): 32-38.
[8]	汪涛，任丽华，张宪国，付勇. 基于储层构型的剩余油研究[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2018, 31(03): 61-67.
[9]	高月刚，刘新菊，王学生，李新春，高祥瑞，梁栋斌. 安塞特低渗透油田水平井加密动用剩余油研究及实践[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2018, 31(02): 42-47.
[10]	王浪波，高祥瑞，代波，刘晓锋，马明宇，赵涛，兀凤娜，陈浩. 特低渗透油藏单砂体研究及注采调整实践—以安塞油田王窑区为例[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2018, 31(02): 82-88.
[11]	陈新宇，张继成，冯阳. 断块稠油油藏剩余油分布特征研究[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2017, 30(4): 55-61.
[12]	苏良银,卜向前,达引朋,黄婷,顾燕凌,段鹏辉. 薄互层剩余油压裂挖潜工艺技术研究与应用[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2017, 30(3): 56-60.
[13]	师昊,李占东,张海翔,梁顺. 聚合物驱合理井距优选及其适应性分析[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2017, 30(2): 55-59.
[14]	殷代印,房雨佳. 三元复合驱微观剩余油驱替机理及动用比例研究[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2017, 30(1): 18-22.
[15]	邵碧莹,李占东,张海翔. 密井网条件下断层边部剩余油挖潜方法———以萨北开发区纯油区西部为例[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2016, 29(5): 60-64.