基于DEA-Malmquist的国内通用航空上市企业经营绩效评价

doi:10.3696/j.issn.1672-6952.2014.01.020

辽宁石油化工大学学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 80-83.DOI: 10.3696/j.issn.1672-6952.2014.01.020

• 经济管理 • 上一篇

基于DEA-Malmquist的国内通用航空上市企业经营绩效评价

姜宝山1,王志红1,苏伟弢2

1.沈阳航空航天大学经济与管理学院,辽宁沈阳110136;2.河北工业大学城市学院,天津300130

收稿日期:2013-09-22 修回日期:2013-11-20 出版日期:2014-02-25 发布日期:2017-07-14
作者简介:姜宝山(1964-),男,博士,教授,从事中小企业融资、企业战略管理、粮油经济等方面的研究;E-mail:jamesbs@163. com。

Based on DEAMalmquist Listed Domestic General  Aviation Business Performance Evaluation

JIANG Baoshan1， WANG Zhihong1， SU Weitao2

（1.School of Economics and Management，Shenyang Aerospace University，Shenyang Liaoning 110136，China； 2.City College of Hebei University of Technology，Tianjin 300130，China）

Received:2013-09-22 Revised:2013-11-20 Published:2014-02-25 Online:2017-07-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用DEA-Malmquist指数法,对22家通用航空上市企业的指标数据进行了静态、动态效率分析。结
果发现,2012年决策样本中有77%的通用航空上市企业综合效率小于1.000,纯技术效率和规模效率都没有达到最
优状态,导致其综合效率低下,没有成为样本标杆企业;2008灢2012年只有5家企业的全要素生产率指数大于1.000,
所有样本企业都出现了技术退步的现象。由此可以看出,技术落后成为提高我国通用航空上市企业经营绩效水平
的主要阻碍,技术创新成为现实选择,并在最后给出相应建议。

关键词: 通用航空 , DEA , 上市企业 , Malmquist , 技术进步

Abstract: Based on the 22 listed companies in general aviation indicator data, DEAMalmquist index method for static and dynamic efficiency analysis was used. The results showed that in 2012 77% of the sample making general aviation listed companies was less than 1.000 in comprehensive efficiency, and the pure technical efficiency and the scale efficiency had not reached the optimal state, resulting in low efficiency of its comprehensive sample did not become a benchmark for enterprises. The period of 20082012 only five companies TFP index greater than 1.000, all the sample enterprises emerged in the phenomenon of regression techniques. Therefore, the technology regression in general aviation companies was the major obstacle. Consequently, the technology progress would be a realistic choice in improving our operating performance level And finally the corresponding recommendations were given.

Key words: General aviation, DEA, Listed companies, Malmquist, Technological progress

姜宝山,王志红,苏伟弢. 基于DEA-Malmquist的国内通用航空上市企业经营绩效评价[J]. 辽宁石油化工大学学报, 2014, 34(1): 80-83.

JIANG Baoshan， WANG Zhihong， SU Weitao. Based on DEAMalmquist Listed Domestic General  Aviation Business Performance Evaluation[J]. Journal of Liaoning Petrochemical University, 2014, 34(1): 80-83.

[1]	秦捷,王璐瑶,尹志国. 辽宁省金融资源配置效率比较与评价[J]. 辽宁石油化工大学学报, 2018, 38(1): 97-100.
[2]	白楠楠，方丹. 基于DEA-Tobit分析的企业社会责任投入与企业绩效研究[J]. 辽宁石油化工大学学报, 2018, 38(05): 95-100.
[3]	陈德艳,钱光明. 多属性逆向拍卖中供应商的投标策略[J]. 辽宁石油化工大学学报, 2011, 31(3): 89-94.

基于DEA-Malmquist的国内通用航空上市企业经营绩效评价

Based on DEAMalmquist Listed Domestic General  Aviation Business Performance Evaluation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics