石油化工高等学校学报

石油化工高等学校学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 49-54.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-396X.2015.05.010

• 石油工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

苏里格气田水平井常规压裂与体积压裂数值模拟

陈姣妮1,  李天太2,  刘均令3,  韩 颖4   

  1.       
    ( 1. 中国石油大学( 北京) 石油工程学院, 北京1 0 2 2 4 9; 2. 西安石油大学石油工程学院, 陕西西安7 1 0 0 6 5;
    3. 中国石化中原油田普光分公司天然气技术管理部, 四川达州6 3 5 0 0 2; 4. 中国石化中原油田采油四厂, 河南濮阳4 5 7 1 7 6)
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-08 修回日期:2015-08-25 出版日期:2015-10-25 发布日期:2015-10-21
  • 作者简介:陈姣妮( 1 9 8 2 - ) , 女, 博士研究生, 从事油气藏模拟方面研究; E - m a i l : m e i h a o 2 0 0 3@1 2 6. c o m。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目( 5 1 4 0 4 1 9 6) 。

Numerical Simulation of Horizontal Gas Well Conventional  Fracturing and Volume Fracturing in Sulige Gas Field

  1. （1.College of Petroleum Engineering，China University of Petroleum，Beijing 102249, China； 2. College of Petroleum Engineering，Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an Shaanxi 710065, China； 3.Natural Gas Technology Management Department, Puguang Branch Company, Zhongyuan Oilfield, Sinopec，Dazhou Sichuan 635002, China； 4. The Forth Oil Production Plant of Zhongyuan Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Puyang Henan 457176, China
  • Received:2015-07-08 Revised:2015-08-25 Published:2015-10-25 Online:2015-10-21

PDF

摘要： 为实现苏里格气田水平井高效开发, 提高气藏最终采收率, 根据体积压裂的原理, 对苏里格气田水平 井体积压裂的适用性进行分析研究。通过数值模拟方法, 对水平井采用常规压裂( 3段) , 体积压裂( 3段2簇、 3段3 簇、 3段4簇和3段5簇) 2种压裂改造方式进行模拟对比。结果表明, 苏里格气田的储层具有天然微裂缝部分发育、 石英含量相对高及渗透率低等因素, 实施体积压裂的条件能基本满足; 根据气藏特点在常规压裂和体积压裂模型中 引入矩形不渗透岩性边界, 该类边界极大减慢气体流向裂缝的渗流速度; 体积压裂同一配产量不同簇数方案的稳产 期均较常规压裂的长, 不同稳产期末、 1 0年末, 体积压裂采出程度随簇数增加而增加, 配产量为8×1 0 4 m3 时, 体积 压裂与常规压裂相比优势更明显; 体积压裂令缝网内压力波及均匀, 避免常规单一裂缝开采时间过长造成的缝周低 压现象。

关键词: 苏里格气田, 水平井, 常规压裂, 体积压裂, 数值模拟

Abstract: In order to realize the efficient development for horizontal well in Sulige Gas Field and improve the ultimate gas recovery, the applicability of volume fracturing horizontal well were analyzed based on the mechanism of volume fracturing. By the method of numerical simulation of horizontal well, the conventional fracturing (3 Section) and volume fracturing (3 Section 2 clusters, 3 Section 3 clusters, 3 Section 4 clusters and 3 Section 5 clusters) were simulated compared two methods for fracturing. The results show that it has a relatively high content of quartz, natural microfracture development, low permeability in Sulige Gas Field, which can meet the basic conditions of implementing volume fracturing. According to the characteristic of gas reservoir，the rectangular impermeable lithological boundary were introduced to the conventional fracturing and volume fracturing model, and the flow velocity of gas to direction of crack was greatly slowed down. The stable period was longer than conventional fracturing, when volume fracturing was with same volume production and different number of the cluster scheme. At different stable final or at the end of 10, the volume of the fracturing degree of recovery increased with the increasing of clustersnumber. When production was 80 000 m3, volume fracturing advantages was more obvious compared with conventional fracturing. Pressure spread was made uniform by volume fracturing in fracture network, which can avoid the low pressure phenomenon caused by long time exploring.

Key words: Sulige gas field,    ,  Horizontal well,   ,  Conventional fracturing,    ,  Volume fracturing,   ,  Numerical simulation

引用本文

陈姣妮, 李天太, 刘均令, 韩 颖. 苏里格气田水平井常规压裂与体积压裂数值模拟[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2015, 28(5): 49-54.

Chen JiaonimLi TiantaimLiu Junling,et al. Numerical Simulation of Horizontal Gas Well Conventional  Fracturing and Volume Fracturing in Sulige Gas Field [J]. Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2015, 28(5): 49-54.

使用本文

0
    /   /   推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal.lnpu.edu.cn/syhg/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-396X.2015.05.010

               http://journal.lnpu.edu.cn/syhg/CN/Y2015/V28/I5/49



网站版权 © 2021《石油化工高等学校学报》编辑部

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发