掺氢天然气管道输送工艺特性

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-396X.2021.06.013

石油化工高等学校学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 81-88.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-396X.2021.06.013

掺氢天然气管道输送工艺特性

崔兆雪¹(), 田磊², 段鹏飞³, 李璐伶³, 李玉星¹, 刘翠伟¹()

^1.中国石油大学（华东）储运与建筑工程学院，山东青岛 266580
^2.中国宏观经济研究院，北京 100038
^3.深圳市燃气集团股份有限公司，深圳 518000

收稿日期:2021-03-03 修回日期:2021-04-29 出版日期:2021-12-25 发布日期:2021-12-29
通讯作者: 刘翠伟
作者简介:崔兆雪（1997⁃），女，硕士研究生，从事掺氢天然气管道输送方面的研究；E⁃mail: 707256021@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51704317);山东省重点研发计划(2019GSF111026);中石油科技创新基金(2018D?5007?0603);广东省重点研发计划(2019B111102001);国家发展和改革委员会能源研究所咨询项目“天然气高效输运利用及其技术装备创新支撑研究”(A31?2019)

Process Characteristics of Hydrogen Blend Natural Gas Pipeline Transportation

Zhaoxue Cui¹(), Lei Tian², Pengfei Duan³, Luling Li³, Yuxing Li¹, Cuiwei Liu¹()

^1.College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering，China University of Petroleum（East China），Qingdao Shandong 266580，China
^2.Academy of Macroeconomic Research，Beijing 100038，China
^3.Shenzhen Gas Corporation Ltd. ，Shenzhen 518000，China

Received:2021-03-03 Revised:2021-04-29 Published:2021-12-25 Online:2021-12-29
Contact: Cuiwei Liu

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

将氢气掺入现役天然气管道中混输是实现氢气大规模、长距离、低成本储运的有效方法，但是氢气的掺入会对天然气管道水力特性和安全等方面造成较大影响。为此，采用SPS软件对不同混氢比（均为摩尔分数）的天然气管道输送工况和泄漏工况进行仿真计算，探究掺氢对天然气管道水力特性、离心压缩机运行特性、泄漏后截断阀压降速率及泄漏量的影响。结果表明，掺入氢气会降低天然气管网的输气效率和压缩机性能，可通过增大压降的方式确保管道输气效率不变；在相同天然气需求下，随混氢比的增大，管道动态压力波动减小；掺氢天然气管道泄漏后，随着混氢比的增加，压降速率和泄漏量均增大,管线截断阀压降速率阈值设定值也要相应增大。该研究成果为确定天然气管道最大混氢比的研究奠定了一定基础，为天然气管道掺氢输送工艺的确定提供了有效借鉴。

关键词: 天然气管道, 掺氢, 水力特性, 压缩机特性, 泄漏, 压降速率阈值

Abstract:

Mixing hydrogen into natural gas pipelines for transportation is an effective way to achieve large?scale,long?distance, and low?cost transportation of hydrogen.However, the mixing of hydrogen will have a great impact on the hydraulic characteristics and safety of natural gas pipeline during transportation.In this regard,SPS software was used to simulate the transportation and leakage conditions of natural gas pipelines with different hydrogen mixing ratios, in order to investigate the effects of hydrogen mixing on the hydraulic characteristics of natural gas pipelines,the operating characteristics of centrifugal compressors,and the pressure drop rate of block valve and leakage after leakage.The results show that adding hydrogen will reduce the gas transmission efficiency of the natural gas pipeline network and compressor performance,which can be compensated by increasing the pressure drop.The dynamic pressure amplitude decreases with the increase of hydrogen mixing ratio under the same natural gas output.When the hydrogen mixed natural gas pipeline leaks,the pressure drop rate and the leakage would increase as the increasing of hydrogen mixing,and the set value of the pressure drop rate threshold of the pipeline block valve also increases accordingly.In conclusion,the research results in this work can provide the basis for the research on determining the maximum of hydrogen mixing ratio in the natural gas pipeline and provide a reference for the determination of hydrogen mixing transportation technology in natural gas pipelines.

Key words: Natural gas pipeline, Hydrogen mixing, Hydraulic characteristics, Compressor characteristics, Leakage, Pressure drop rate threshold

中图分类号:

TE832

崔兆雪, 田磊, 段鹏飞, 李璐伶, 李玉星, 刘翠伟. 掺氢天然气管道输送工艺特性[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2021, 34(6): 81-88.

Zhaoxue Cui, Lei Tian, Pengfei Duan, Luling Li, Yuxing Li, Cuiwei Liu. Process Characteristics of Hydrogen Blend Natural Gas Pipeline Transportation[J]. Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2021, 34(6): 81-88.

图/表 15

图1 流量和输气功率随混氢比的变化

Fig.1 Change of flow rate and gas transmission power with hydrogen mixing ratio

图2 输气功率随混氢比的变化

Fig.2 Change of gas transmission power with hydrogen mixing ratio

图3 相同流量下管道终点压力随混氢比的变化曲线

Fig. 3 Change of pipe end pressure with hydrogen mixing ratio under the same flow rate

Fig.4 Flow and dynamic pressure changes at the end of the pipeline

图5 压缩机参数随混氢比的变化

Fig.5 Variation of compressor parameters with hydrogen mixing ratio

图6 混氢比改变后压缩机性能曲线

Fig.6 Compressor performance curve after hydrogen mixing ratio is changed

图7 仿真模型

Fig.7 Simulation model

图8 混氢比10%泄漏工况上下游压力和压降速率变化

Fig.8 Variations of pressure and pressure drop rate in upstream and downstream at 10% hydrogen content

图9 不同混氢比在相同泄漏工况上下游压降速率变化

Fig.9 Variations of pressure drop rate in upstream and downstream at different hydrogen content

图10 纯天然气泄漏与分输工况的上游压降速率对比

Fig.10 Comparison of pressure drop rate in upstream of pure natural gas under leakage and distribution conditions

表1 阈值取值结果

Table 1 Threshold value results

工况	A/ km	阈值/（MPa $⋅$ min^-1)
工况	A/ km	0	10%	20%	30%	40%	50%	60%	70%	80%	90%	100%
1	15	0.225 0	0.240 0	0.265 3	0.290 8	0.320 7	0.354 0	0.395 1	0.444 6	0.513 1	0.619 5	0.816 1
2	10	0.340 4	0.360 7	0.396 8	0.433 5	0.474 7	0.521 8	0.577 8	0.647 3	0.739 3	0.883 0	1.150 3
3	5	0.562 9	0.598 5	0.652 4	0.704 2	0.770 6	0.835 4	0.923 4	1.009 0	1.120 5	1.319 5	1.678 3
4	20	0.190 0	0.205 8	0.221 7	0.241 8	0.260 7	0.290 4	0.327 3	0.361 3	0.420 4	0.508 2	0.677 9
5	25	0.172 5	0.184 3	0.201 8	0.220 9	0.240 1	0.263 7	0.297 7	0.328 6	0.386 4	0.466 9	0.621 3

表1 阈值取值结果

Table 1 Threshold value results

工况	A/ km	阈值/（MPa $⋅$ min^-1)
工况	A/ km	0	10%	20%	30%	40%	50%	60%	70%	80%	90%	100%
1	15	0.225 0	0.240 0	0.265 3	0.290 8	0.320 7	0.354 0	0.395 1	0.444 6	0.513 1	0.619 5	0.816 1
2	10	0.340 4	0.360 7	0.396 8	0.433 5	0.474 7	0.521 8	0.577 8	0.647 3	0.739 3	0.883 0	1.150 3
3	5	0.562 9	0.598 5	0.652 4	0.704 2	0.770 6	0.835 4	0.923 4	1.009 0	1.120 5	1.319 5	1.678 3
4	20	0.190 0	0.205 8	0.221 7	0.241 8	0.260 7	0.290 4	0.327 3	0.361 3	0.420 4	0.508 2	0.677 9
5	25	0.172 5	0.184 3	0.201 8	0.220 9	0.240 1	0.263 7	0.297 7	0.328 6	0.386 4	0.466 9	0.621 3

图11 纯天然气泄漏位置对阈值的影响

Fig.11 The influence of leak location on threshold under pure natural gas

表2 不同混氢比多项式拟合曲线和管线阈值设定值

Table 2 Polynomial fitting curve and threshold value of pipeline at different hydrogen mole fraction

混氢比/%	拟合曲线	管线阈值/（MPa $⋅$ min^-1）
0	y=-1.612 8x³+3.680 2x²- 2.877 0x+0.948 2	0.133 2
10	y=-1.598 4x³+3.719 8x²- 2.960 8x+0.995 0	0.155 6
20	y=-1.807 2x³+4.149 0x²- 3.268 7x+1.090 7	0.163 8
30	y=-1.798 2x³+4.222 9x²- 3.399 4x+1.162 2	0.187 5
40	y=-1.845 0x³+4.425 0x²- 3.632 0x+1.261 7	0.209 7
50	y=-1.960 2x³+4.683 7x²- 3.853 3x+1.357 0	0.227 2
60	y=-2.244 6x³+5.287 5x²- 4.293 2x+1.502 9	0.252 6
70	y=-1.951 2x³+4.925 8x²- 4.266 2x+1.592 7	0.301 1
80	y=-1.733 4x³+4.729 0x²- 4.337 5x+1.720 8	0.378 9
90	y=-1.854 0x³+5.204 8x²- 4.887 2x+1.998 9	0.462 5
100	y=-2.019 6x³+5.957 7x²- 5.804 1x+2.491 2	0.625 2

表2 不同混氢比多项式拟合曲线和管线阈值设定值

Table 2 Polynomial fitting curve and threshold value of pipeline at different hydrogen mole fraction

混氢比/%	拟合曲线	管线阈值/（MPa $⋅$ min^-1）
0	y=-1.612 8x³+3.680 2x²- 2.877 0x+0.948 2	0.133 2
10	y=-1.598 4x³+3.719 8x²- 2.960 8x+0.995 0	0.155 6
20	y=-1.807 2x³+4.149 0x²- 3.268 7x+1.090 7	0.163 8
30	y=-1.798 2x³+4.222 9x²- 3.399 4x+1.162 2	0.187 5
40	y=-1.845 0x³+4.425 0x²- 3.632 0x+1.261 7	0.209 7
50	y=-1.960 2x³+4.683 7x²- 3.853 3x+1.357 0	0.227 2
60	y=-2.244 6x³+5.287 5x²- 4.293 2x+1.502 9	0.252 6
70	y=-1.951 2x³+4.925 8x²- 4.266 2x+1.592 7	0.301 1
80	y=-1.733 4x³+4.729 0x²- 4.337 5x+1.720 8	0.378 9
90	y=-1.854 0x³+5.204 8x²- 4.887 2x+1.998 9	0.462 5
100	y=-2.019 6x³+5.957 7x²- 5.804 1x+2.491 2	0.625 2

图12 管线阈值随混氢比变化曲线

Fig.12 The curve of pipeline threshold with hydrogen mixing ratio

图13 不同混氢比的泄漏量变化

Fig.13 Leakage changes with different hydrogen mixing ratio

参考文献 19

1	张英，王红涛.氢能，能源进化的新路径［N］.中国石化报，2020⁃07⁃27（4）.
2	单彤文，宋鹏飞，李又武，等.制氢、储运和加注全产业链氢气成本分析［J］.天然气化工，2020，45（1）：85⁃90.
	Shan T W，Song P F，Li Y W，et al.Cost analysis of hydrogen from the perspective of the whole industral chain of production，storage，transportation and refueling［J］.Natural Gas Chemical Industry，2020，45（1）：85⁃90.
3	Zine L M，Fotis R，Mahar D，et al.Hazards，safety and knowledge gaps on hydrogen transmission via natural gas grid：A critical review［J］.International Journal of Hydrogen Energy，2016，41（39）：17511⁃17525.
4	Dries H，William D.The use of the natural⁃gas pipeline infrastructure for hydrogen transport in a changing market structure［J］.International Journal of Hydrogen Energy，2007，32（10⁃11）：1381⁃1386.
5	Judd R，Pinchbeck D.Hydrogen admixture to the natural gas grid［J］.Compendium of Hydrogen Energy，2016（8）：165⁃192.
6	黄明，吴勇，文习之，等.利用天然气管道掺混输送氢气的可行性分析［J］.煤气与热力，2013，33（4）：39⁃42.
	Huang M，Wu Y，Wen X Z，et al.Feasibility analysis of hydrogen transport in natural gas pipeline［J］.Gas & Heat，2013，33（4）：39⁃42.
7	马向阳，黄小美，吴嫦.天然气掺氢对家用燃气灶燃烧特性的影响研究［J］.可再生能源，2018，36（12）：1746⁃1751.
	Ma X Y，Huang X M，Wu C.Study on the influence of natural gas hydrogenation on combustion characteristics of domestic gas cooker［J］.Renewable Energy Resources，2018，36（12）：1746⁃1751.
8	罗子萱，徐华池，袁满.天然气掺混氢气在家用燃气具上燃烧的安全性及排放性能测试与评价［J］.石油与天然气化工， 2019，48（2）：50⁃55.
	Luo Z X，Xu H C，Yuan M.Safety and emission performance test and evaluation of natural gas mixed with hydrogen combustion on domestic gas appliances［J］.Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas，2019，48（2）：50⁃55.
9	Tabkhi F，Azzaro C，Pibouleau L，et al.A mathematical framework for modelling and evaluating natural gas pipeline networks under hydrogen injection［J］.International Journal of Hydrogen Energy，2008，33（21）：6222⁃6231.
10	Guandalini G，Colberataldo P，Campanari S.Dynamic modeling of natural gas quality within transport pipelines in presence of hydrogen injections［J］.Applied Energy，2017，185（2）：1712⁃1723.
11	Irfan A G，Mukhtar H S.Prospects of natural gas pipeline infrastructure in hydrogen transportation［J］.International Journal of Energy Research，2011，36（15）：1338⁃1345.
12	Melaina M W，Antonia O，Penev M.Blending hydrogen into natural gas pipeline networks：A review of key issues［R］.Colorado USA：National Renewable Energy Laboratory，2013.
13	Klopffer M H，Beren P，Castagnet S，et al.Proceedings of the18th world hydrogen energy conference 2010［C］.Essen：Forschungszentrums Jülich，2010．
14	Swain M R，Shriber J，Swain M N.Comparison of hydrogen，natural gas，liquified petroleum gas，and gasoline leakage in a Residential Garage［J］.Energy & Fuels，1998，12（1）：83⁃89.
15	赵永志，张鑫，郑津洋，等.掺氢天然气管道输送安全技术［J］.化工机械，2016，43（1）：1⁃7.
	Zhao Y Z，Zhang X，Zheng J Y，et al.Safety technology for pipeline transportation of hydrogen⁃natural gas mixtures［J］.Chemical Engineering & Machinery，2016，43（1）：1⁃7.
16	张双蕾，陈凤，孙在蓉，等.输气管道线路截断阀压降速率设定值研究［J］.天然气与石油，2015，33（4）：7⁃11．
	Zhang S L，Chen F，Sun Z R，et al.Study on pressure drop rate set value of block valve in gas pipeline［J］.Natural Gas and Oil，2015，33（4）：7⁃11.
17	汪世军.Shafer气液联动阀执行机构功能与维护［J］.油气储运，2010，29（4）：296⁃298．
	Wang S J.Function of Shafer gas⁃hydraulic valve actuator and care［J］.Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation，2010，29（4）：296⁃298.
18	徐文强.长输管道SHAFER干线截断阀动作过程分析［J］.产业与科技坛，2012，11（9）：71⁃73.
	Xu W Q.Analysis of operation process of block valve in SHAFER trunk line of long⁃distance pipeline［J］.Industrial & Science Tribune，2012，11（9）：71⁃73.
19	王彪.输气管道截断阀安全关断的环道与仿真实验研究［D］.成都：西南石油大学，2015.

[1]	李延豪, 侯磊, 于巧燕, 柴冲, 肖开喜. 浅海天然气管道泄漏扩散过程模拟研究[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2022, 35(2): 74-80.
[2]	吕广. 浅层气防治技术在渤海A油田的应用[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2018, 31(6): 88-94.
[3]	李政,顾贵洲. 低温地区陆地泄漏原油的生物降解研究进展[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2018, 31(02): 1-7.
[4]	王莉莉,张寒,齐晗兵,李栋. 高温下含椭球型缺陷管道局部应力分析[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2018, 31(01): 95-100.
[5]	吴梦雨,梁永图,何国玺,李岩松,谢成. 成品油管道泄漏量测算软件[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2017, 30(2): 71-76.
[6]	王程龙,谢禹钧,韦权权,于小泽. 基于MonteCarlo法管道连接法兰泄漏概率计算[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2016, 29(2): 95-98.
[7]	李泽, 马贵阳. 埋地输油管道泄漏三维数值模拟[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2015, 28(5): 85-90.
[8]	黄启玉, 曹鑫鑫, 唐骏琪, 许琛琛, 兰浩. 天然气管道氮气隔离混气长度研究[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2014, 27(1): 84-89.
[9]	范开峰,王卫强,马跃,姜晗,庞自啸. 天然气管道氮气置换过程混气段数值模拟[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2013, 26(1): 63-67.
[10]	王岳,马跃,史俊杰,范开峰,王晓明. 泄漏油品在不同颗粒直径土壤中扩散范围计算[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2012, 25(6): 56-58.
[11]	刘珂,吴明,邵大伟,范开峰,王卫强. 埋地天然气管道泄漏数值模拟[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2012, 25(6): 59-62.
[12]	徐立志,宋尔明,孔祥军,吴艳,王志军. 基于小波分析的输油管道泄漏点定位研究[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2012, 25(6): 75-77.
[13]	付俊涛,李玉星,孟令雅,刘超. 输气管道泄漏音波与干扰信号特征提取[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2012, 25(2): 53-60.
[14]	程浩力,刘德俊,刘倩倩. 城燃管道街道峡谷泄漏扩散CFD数值模拟[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2011, 24(4): 60-63.
[15]	章博,陈国明. 化工装置硫化氢泄漏对周边居民影响的CFD评估[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2009, 22(4): 72-76.

掺氢天然气管道输送工艺特性

Process Characteristics of Hydrogen Blend Natural Gas Pipeline Transportation

HTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics